Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vel'Sharen"

Latest revision as of 08:44, 20 April 2013

Moving Imperial Guard

I think the section about the Imperial Guard merits its own article (plus, IMO, it kind of breaks the format leaving the member section at the middle of the page - and looks ugly to me XD). Besides, some of these people were not Sharen anyway.

Any thoughts or objections? --Shoedrinker 19:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)

Hmm. I agree that the full character list there is bulky and out of place. I do think the Imperial Guard should be noted on the Vel'Sharen page, but this may be a good use for the {{main}} template (or just a link to a page with a complete list).

We could also toy around with the idea of making a category to tag each of those pages in so a person could look up the list of Imperial Guard Characters in the index. I'm only wary about this because it sets a precedent - why not Highland Raider Characters, or Templar Characters, or Pop-Star characters? It could get unwieldy pretty quickly. :P

In any case, as far as I'm concerned, you're clear to make a new page for it.

- Jak'iaah 08:44, 20 April 2013 (EDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Any thoughts or objections? --[[User:Shoedrinker|Shoedrinker]] 19:48, 19 April 2013 (EDT)
+-----
+Hmm. I agree that the full character list there is bulky and out of place. I do think the Imperial Guard should be noted on the Vel'Sharen page, but this may be a good use for the {{[[Template:main|main]]}} template (or just a link to a page with a complete list).
+We could also toy around with the idea of making a category to tag each of those pages in so a person could look up the list of Imperial Guard Characters in the index. I'm only wary about this because it sets a precedent - why not Highland Raider Characters, or Templar Characters, or Pop-Star characters? It could get unwieldy pretty quickly. :P
+In any case, as far as I'm concerned, you're clear to make a new page for it.
+- [[User:Jak&#39;iaah|Jak&#39;iaah]] 08:44, 20 April 2013 (EDT)